<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buxmarks &#187; article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buxmarks.com/tag/article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buxmarks.com</link>
	<description>User Experience Bookmarks and Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:45:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Drop-Down Usability: When You Should (and Shouldn&#8217;t) Use Them</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/18/drop-down-usability-when-you-should-and-shouldn%e2%80%99t-use-them/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/18/drop-down-usability-when-you-should-and-shouldn%e2%80%99t-use-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user interface]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drop-down lists are great – when used correctly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drop-down lists are great – when used correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/18/drop-down-usability-when-you-should-and-shouldn%e2%80%99t-use-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11 Principles of Interaction Design explained</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/13/11-principles-of-interaction-design-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/13/11-principles-of-interaction-design-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interaction design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post isn’t intended to be an exhaustive list of interaction design principles, its merely an introduction to the subject. And I’m definitely not going to attempt to enter the lions den of defining what ‘interaction design’ is, that’s for another day!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post isn’t intended to be an exhaustive list of interaction design principles, its merely an introduction to the subject. And I’m definitely not going to attempt to enter the lions den of defining what ‘interaction design’ is, that’s for another day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/13/11-principles-of-interaction-design-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User Experience and the Platform War</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/11/user-experience-and-the-platform-war/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/11/user-experience-and-the-platform-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is one thing constant about the technology industry, it’s the fact that there is always a battle taking place. Whether it’s to dominate a platform or agree on standards, we are always evolving, and often debating over which direction is best. It’s imperative, however, that our focus on user experience not get lost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is one thing constant about the technology industry, it’s the fact that there is always a battle taking place. Whether it’s to dominate a platform or agree on standards, we are always evolving, and often debating over which direction is best. It’s imperative, however, that our focus on user experience not get lost in the crossfire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/08/11/user-experience-and-the-platform-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Users Read on the Web</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/22/how-users-read-on-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/22/how-users-read-on-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In research on how people read websites we found that 79 percent of our test users always scanned any new page they came across; only 16 percent read word-by-word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In research on how people read websites we found that 79 percent of our test users always scanned any new page they came across; only 16 percent read word-by-word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/22/how-users-read-on-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beyond Frustration: Three levels of happy design</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/21/beyond-frustration-three-levels-of-happy-design/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/21/beyond-frustration-three-levels-of-happy-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happiness is a topic I&#8217;ve been interested in for a while. According to Darrin McMahon, author of Happiness: A History, happiness is a relatively new construct in the history of humanness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happiness is a topic I&#8217;ve been interested in for a while. According to Darrin McMahon, author of Happiness: A History, happiness is a relatively new construct in the history of humanness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/21/beyond-frustration-three-levels-of-happy-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dirtiest Word in UX: Complexity</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/13/the-dirtiest-word-in-ux-complexity/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/13/the-dirtiest-word-in-ux-complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 08:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don’t have to be a UX practitioner to understand that simplicity is a good thing; no one goes around the office saying, &#8220;Alright team, let’s make this application really, really complex!&#8221;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don’t have to be a UX practitioner to understand that simplicity is a good thing; no one goes around the office saying, &#8220;Alright team, let’s make this application really, really complex!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/07/13/the-dirtiest-word-in-ux-complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Anatomy of a Website</title>
		<link>http://buxmarks.com/2010/05/07/the-anatomy-of-a-website/</link>
		<comments>http://buxmarks.com/2010/05/07/the-anatomy-of-a-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buxmarks.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people find it hard to picture a website as more than a bundle of content. This often makes explaining the mixture of languages used and the way everything comes together a difficult task.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people find it hard to picture a website as more than a bundle of content. This often makes explaining the mixture of languages used and the way everything comes together a difficult task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buxmarks.com/2010/05/07/the-anatomy-of-a-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

